banner



Home  ›  What Is The Best Height For A Camera Tripod

What Is The Best Height For A Camera Tripod

Written By Thursday, April 28, 2022 Add Comment Edit
  1. I'thou virtually v-viii. I ordered a Feisol traveler tripod (http://www.feisol.net/feisol-traveler-tripod-ct3441s-rapid-p-38.html), and it seems like I may have to curve a piddling chip, if I don't extend the center cavalcade. I considered getting the tournament tripod, which I believe is 2 inches taller, but I feared that it may be as well tall.
    What's the optimum height for a tripod, should it be middle level? Should I get the tournament tripod instead? Whatsoever i else who is nearly 5-eight here, I'd like to know what kind of tripod you lot use and your thoughts on my dilemma
    Thank you!
  2. I don't know this tripod, simply extending the eye a pocket-size amount should not be a problem. If you think that a tripod 2 inches taller might exist too tall, then information technology seems that the corporeality of extension would be very pocket-sized. In the absence of reviews from trusted sources, or being able to try it, I would worry more near the thickness (or, rather, thin-ness) of the lowest leg section, given that this is a low-cal, four-section tripod.
  3. Also, if yous had an eye level tripod, information technology would be positioned to take perfectly boring eye level photos. Everybody sees the world at eye level, show them something different.
  4. Your choice in tripod will be a compromise between price, weight and acme. The taller it gets the more expensive and heavier information technology gets. To get as light a tripod for a given size as possible you lot'll spend quite a flake (carbon fiber). Yous demand to figure out what your needs are. Are you lot going be conveying it around for long distances? You'll want something you can comfortably comport. Practise yous programme on taking long exposure shots with information technology? Y'all'll need something very stable. And virtually importantly, what'southward your upkeep?
    And as far equally extending the center cavalcade is concerned, I retrieve your a footling too worried well-nigh it. Sure, all the style downward is more stable, but so is having the legs collapsed. The center column is at that place for a reason, because it works. I use mine fully extended quite a chip and have establish information technology just requires a little more care in not creating any vibrations.
  5. Thanks for the comments then far. But to clarify, I already got the 3441, and since information technology's even so not also late to exchange it for the tournament one (and the tournament one isn't that much more expensive), price -wise I'm skillful. Just wondering which i will serve me better in the long run.
    Thank you...
  6. Everybody sees the world at middle level, show them something different.​
    Thats funny. A lot of people I see photographing hand-held seem to want to crouch or go on 1 knee every bit a matter of course to have a photograph- whether information technology needs that or not. I've never worked that 1 out unless you're photographing something low and close.
    The expert affair nearly a tripod that gets y'all to centre level (or even a fraction above if you use live view or can find something to stand on) is that it increases flexibility. Yous don't accept to photograph like that all the time.
    Depending on what you photograph, it could well exist more significant to become a tripod that can be prepare low enough rather than just worry about max. top. Then if you lot wing, the ability to fit the tripod in your baggage is arguably every bit important as how tall information technology is with legs extended.
    My Manfrotto 055CX Pro3 allows me to work exactly at eye level with a RRS ballhead/clamp attached. And thats exactly what I want- I don't want habitually to extend the centre column, and find that to apply a tripod that requires me to bend a little hurts my neck afterwards a few days on a trip. Fewer than 10% of my photographs are taken at other than eye height and I don't think would be at all improved if I bent, crouched, knelt or lay on the floor. In that context the ability but to extend the legs to the max. rather than have to think virtually extension or keep adjusting it is very user-friendly.
  7. Everybody sees the world at their centre level, show them something different. :)
  8. Y'all tin always under-extend a tripod, or splay the legs - wanting to shoot from a lower tiptop isn't a reason to buy a shorter tripod unless that's all you'll e'er do. Shooting downwards is merely as novel an angle, not that I advise anybody gets the tallest Gitzo. However, bear in mind that even eye level isn't always going to suffice, especially if you lot similar to shoot downhill (with the legs on a lower level than you) or upwards (looking up into the finder). I deliberately chose a TVC-34L over a TVC-33 knowing that I'll ordinarily use it with the bottom leg sections collapsed, because I can extend them if I really need more than height. I also have a 055CXPro3, and like David I observe information technology's about the correct peak with the column down, just it's certainly bigger and more expensive than shorter tripods. With a big head (like the MF393 gimbal) it'due south arguably too tall, and adjusting the legs to compensate is a pain - if just there was a higher-terminate Neotec...

    Information technology's non catastrophic to have a tripod that just goes to crouching height - bending over to peer through the finder is normal - but if you take to crouch also much for every shot, you'll feel it in your neck and back. I accept to admit that 128cm is pretty brusque for a "proper" tripod, only it depends what you lot're hanging off it equally to whether you trust the heart column. I've used a Velbon VTP-777 and a Tamrac ZipShot, and for portability they're amazing even if they're simply really emergency tripods, and then even poor lowish support can be worth it. For the cost of the 3441s, I'd probably want something more than solid (a list $388 is a lot to spend on the level of stability you'll get if you accept the column extended ofttimes) and taller (43cm doesn't sound all that portable if you're trying to compromise packing), but if you're shooting for low weight and then I've no particular reason to dispute the choice. That said, I don't really buy into the calorie-free tripod principle - you need weight for stability anyway, and in my experience the weight of most tripods is significantly impacted by adding a decent head. Carbon fibre seems to exist more than useful for stability and vibration reduction than for the weight saving, to me.

    Not that I've any experience of Feisols, or claim to exist a tripod good, so have this as my $.02.

  9. I personally can't stand up to curve over to use a tripod. Many people don't seem to mind, however.
    I've shrunk to 178cm (5'10") in my onetime historic period and virtually tripods are as well short for my taste.
    You can e'er shorten whatsoever tripod.
    First extending the center and you starting time to lose the reason you're using a tripod in the first place.
    When I need support (not a truss), I use a monopod with a Manfrotto grip brawl head much more than I do my tripods.
  10. You have to take the inherent compromises when choosing a 'travel' tripod and prioritize. This is not your 'go-to' tripod, presumably. (Nobodoy'due south 'become-to' tripod should have 4-department legs and a 2-section column;) How much utilise volition it get?
    Grab the nearest record measure and do some math. Consider the increased pinnacle from what lies betwixt the viewfinder and tripod'due south shoulder, e.grand. torso size, vertical grip, bracket, clench, ballhead. Oft overlooked but very significant.
  11. I'm 6-something (1,ninety) and a Manfrotto 055DB with markins ballhead is nicely center level without using the center column - I much appreciate that. Setting up the tripod at a lower height isn't going to harm stability. Having to use the centre cavalcade to brand information technology longer will.
    As far as I care - the higher without centre column, the improve.
  12. I would say that the ideal tripod is one that, with the column downward, puts a camera at eye level when the legs are dropped fully open up. If y'all want higher, the cavalcade tin can go up, and if yous want lower, you tin lower the legs. What I find a chip annoying is 1 that goes besides high automatically and always requires lowering for normal use, or one that goes manner too low and e'er requires stooping or cavalcade extension.
    I retrieve I'one thousand basically in the same camp as JDM von Weinberg here, except that I'k a couple of inches shorter. I had to shorten the bottom legs on my Manfrotto/Bogen 3225 to exist comfortable.
  13. When the subject is far abroad, the best summit is center level when the legs are fully extended and the column is not extended. (When the subject is far away, the height has very little effect on the point of view)
    When the bailiwick is close, the all-time height is the one that gives you the indicate of view that yous want. This could exist heart level, or ii feet loftier. I am alpine, so if I shoot a portrait at eye level of a normal height person, it isn't going to look right.
  14. A good rule of thumb is your height minus xiv inches with no cavalcade extension. Good hunting.
  15. Edward gives a good reference number. Since the camera sees a little bit more above and below our normal vision, putting a photographic camera at "eye level" will make it appear much taller than it really is. If you lot're five feet tall, that works fine - but if you're six feet alpine, your photos will await a little odd.
    That said, I adopt my tripod to be taller when I am using a long lens, since information technology'southward much more comfortable, and the 'actress peak' effect isn't noticeable on those lenses. When shooting portraits, I almost always position the tripod at the field of study'south eye level. And when shooting with a waist-level finder, or a flip-upward LCD screen, I generally gear up up the tripod so the camera is about sternum height, again for comfort.
    And then once again, when I go out shooting around town, I tend to adapt the top of my tripod every-other shot or so.
    The proper, but inconclusive answer, is that the correct meridian is the 1 that gives you the photograph that you want, and is the most comfy to piece of work with. If y'all're lucky, that'southward the same height.
  16. Information technology all depends on what you are photographing. Shooting portraits is quite unlike to landscapes etc. With portraits it also depends on whether the subject is brusque or tall too...too many variables.
  17. good rule of thumb is your height minus 14 inches with no column extension.​
    Coming back to the thread I saw this, which may or may not be useful depending on your tripod and the head you put on it. The viewfinder on my 5Dii is 6.five" above the top plate of my Manfrotto. Then fourteen" less than my height is going to be lower than I want to use most of the fourth dimension, or maybe the person coming up with this number had one hell of a forehead.
    Conspicuously, it would exist helpful if a measurement took place from at worst, the height plate of the head and ideally would accept into business relationship the distance from base of camera to viewfinder. For me, given my ball-head and photographic camera the right number is 12", which also suffices for vertical shots using an L plate and allows for the slight loss of superlative occurring when you lean towards the camera and so y'all're not touching the tripod.
    Sounds nit-picky; but the OP'southward stick or twist dilemma is over the aforementioned two"
  18. I like that my tripod can put my camera at my eye level, when I demand or desire it there. I'grand half dozen'1", I utilize a Manfrotto 055XPROB, with either a 496RC2 head, or the 393 "gimbal" head. But it takes a bit more than just the tripod legs to get there!
    When measuring, don't forget:
    • It is nearly e'er easier to make a tripod shorter rather than longer. You don't have to extend the legs fully all the fourth dimension.
    • The viewfinder of the photographic camera does not sit straight on the top of the tripod! measure your camera and add together that to the tripod acme for the viewfinder. Don't forget the grip, if you utilise one!
    • The head you choose adds height to the tripod.
    • The quick-release may besides contribute to the superlative, especially if it is not an included part of the head.
    • The "height" of the viewfinder can change every bit you tilt the photographic camera! If you need to shoot down, y'all may need to be taller than the tripod so you can see down (of grade, the legs adjust to assistance this...), or you may need to crouch somewhat when shooting up.
    With my gripped 7D, the 055XPROB and 496RC2 combo only about put the viewfinder at eye level when I'grand standing. If I need to shoot downward, I accept to brand adjustments. Same with the 393 head and my 100-400 zoom mounted. Actually, it'due south almost a little alpine in that case, but since most of what I'm shooting (birds) is higher than me, it works out.
  19. One extra thought: If the viewfinder is at middle height without stooping, it's hard either to wait over the camera when checking your subject (yes, you can look around, but that tends to alter the composition more for a lot of scenes and can be annoying if you're notwithstanding strapped to everything for security) and it'southward a hurting to look at an LCD on the height of the photographic camera (you can usually uses an info button of some sort, simply it'due south more intrusive). There'southward something to be said for a lens axis at chin superlative so you can peek a scrap. The head commonly has a large (though not unlimited) range of comfortable motion, so fixating on a couple of inches difference is probably overkill. As well, I have different tripod heads that differ by more than that much. Just some extra musings...
  20. "Also, if yous had an eye level tripod, information technology would be positioned to take perfectly dull eye level photos. Everybody sees the
    world at eye level, testify them something different."

    If the pictures someone takes at centre level, whether they are up on a ladder,standing on your ain two anxiety, squatting,
    sitting, or lying on your abdomen, are "perfectly dull" -- the problem lies with the photographer and not the height of the
    camera.

  21. "Besides, if y'all had an eye level tripod, information technology would be positioned to take perfectly dull eye level photos. Everybody sees the
    earth at middle level, show them something different."

    If the pictures someone takes at eye level, whether they are up on a ladder,standing on your own two anxiety, squatting,
    sitting, or lying on your belly, are "perfectly deadening" -- the problem lies with the lensman and non the height of the
    photographic camera.

  22. Thank you to all of you lot for all your responses. I've decided to return this tripod and get a taller ane.
  23. To me the taller the tripod the amend. I'm just about 5' 9" so I don't need a very alpine tripod , but when I shop for them these days, I want something that is at least 65 inches in peak, or taller. The reason is that 65 inches is the equivalent of 5' five" pregnant I would only have to raise the center column by three or four inches to accomplish heart level.
    If I needed something shorter I could just recess the legs. With brusque tripods you are stuck because you lot can go shorter, but you lot can't go any taller.
    I don't similar bending downwardly too much to accept pictures particularly when the camera is in the vertical position. Taller tripos allow y'all to shoot taller subjects and even shoot down at shorter subjects. They requite you more flexibility and stability.
    The merely problem is that that they are usually heavier and more expensive and harder to come by, but existence light-weight is not the only selection to consider when buying a tripod, unless y'all have a bad back. There are other options such every bit as meridian and weight bearing load. I learned this the hardway after purchasing tripods that are now collecting grit in the closet.
  24. The camera and head adds over 6" to the tripod, and it'southward more than comfortable to stoop just a bit to see through the finder. A tripod measuring 52" is probably acceptable for routine photography. Mine is 55", and I ofttimes lower it merely a scrap for comfort. I accept 1 that is 78" alpine, without a column, that I apply for video to accomplish over the heads of an audition, and another monster at 96", which also has its utilise, if you carry a four' step ladder likewise.
    The 78" tripod is a Gitzo GT-3541XLS, which is much besides tall for landscapes, although information technology is not peculiarly heavy. When I mount a video camera, I have to stand on a chair to reach all of the controls or load tape. I employ the shorter, GT3541LS model for routine photography, using only two of the three leg extensions. I'1000 5'9" and shrinking.
  25. Thats funny. A lot of people I see photographing mitt-held seem to desire to crouch or get on one articulatio genus equally a affair of course to have a photo- whether it needs that or not. I've never worked that i out unless you're photographing something low and close.​
    I simply wish that bolded statement was truthful. I never see people spontaneously put 1 human knee on the dingy footing to get a skilful perspective. Frankly if my dad did that he may not exist able to become up!
    Seriously though take you ever worked with medium format cameras? A lot of them accept waste product level finders. Did you ever wonder why pros doing high dollar manner shoots would utilize a waste level finder if eye level was the all-time perspective? As someone mentioned the photographic camera's field of view will include a large area above your eyes if you hold it straight, specially in portrait orientation if you are shooting 35mm. Then to maximize your negative and do things like full body shots without tilting your photographic camera you have to driblet it below middle level. Cypher screams apprentice like distracting keystoning in all your pictures. No perspective is perfect merely if yous are a >vi'er like me shooting everything from the perspective of God begins to expect a flake amateurish after awhile.
  26. Optimum tripod height is exactly that meridian needed to identify the camera where you desire it. Preceding responses make clear that this will vary from person to person, and from photo to photo.
    I suppose it's true that a tripod that is taller than you tin work with, might be overkill.

Share This Page

Source: https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/whats-the-optimum-tripod-height.472592/

Posted by: jamescithys.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Is The Best Height For A Camera Tripod"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel